The market owner has no liability for providing these facilities. However, for established market sites it is likely there is an electrical supply, which can be individually metered for traders’ use. This can provide a safer and neater market environment so as to avoid petrol generators and gas cylinders etc. Where hand washing facilities are a necessity for certain traders, there are portable hand washing units available if there isn’t a water and waste provided at the stall.
These companies are offering a service, as such are deemed to be street trading. A temporary street licence could be offered or treated as illegal street trading.
This really depends on what activity is taking place. If any selling is taking place then this can be dealt with as illegal street trading. But if the activity appears to be causing an offence, inciting hatred or causing an offence then only the Police have the necessary powers to take any action.
Markets are so much more than just a retail outlet; they should be the centre point of a diverse community. As market operators we should encourage such groups as they add value to the overall offer. This being said, a clear local policy should be in place as to how often individual charities/community groups can attend, what facilities they can use, whether they should pay the standard market charges and what stance is to be taken when dealing with political and religious groups.
How you expect waste to be dealt with – including the separation of recyclable materials – should be clearly laid out within your market regulations, with the enforcement of these regulations being adopted by those who day-to-day operate the market. You need adequate staff to monitor the problem and take appropriate compliance action. It is also essential that you make sure you have the adequate facility to house the waste, as on busier days overspill can breed non-compliance.
Local weather conditions tend to dictate what should be done. For instance, it can be dangerously windy in one part of the country meaning that stalls can be blown over and goods scattered, yet other parts of the country can have ideal trading conditions. Market management has to consider the safety of the public, traders and their own staff as a priority. Ultimately the responsibility lies with the markets operator to deem the area safe for trading. Consideration should be given to wind speeds, impending weather conditions, surface conditions (eg frost, snow, ice) and types of stall/equipment being used as part of your risk assessments. Market operators also need to have an operational policy in place to deal with the question of “Should traders be charged when a market is closed for safety reasons due to bad weather?”
More operators are looking into cashless payment options for safety and security purposes. These include chip and pin terminals, direct invoicing and web based payment systems. You may find details of commercial systems in trade publications. Talk to other market operators who currently operate using alternative systems and view NABMA sponsors.
The obvious advantage of using pop ups is that the market infrastructure can shrink and grow on demand. This gives the beneficial perception to the shopper that the market is full – because empty stalls are definitely a “put-off” for customers. The flexibility of pop-ups also means that they can be relocated to more advantageous pedestrianised areas to capture footfall. The other key benefit is that they can create a qualitative market scene as they are an attractive backdrop for traders’ goods. However, there are a number of financial and operational issues to consider including:the cost of the pop ups; the resources needed to erect and dismantle the temporary stalls – and the need for transport and storage; the need for holding-down devices (aka ground anchors) due to wind conditions; the cost of repairs and maintenance; and their vulnerability when operating in adverse weather conditions. You are advised to closely research the pros and cons by talking to stall suppliers, to other managers and to your and other traders where they are in use.
Many of your market traders earn their living as a result of market trading so it is necessary to have a consultation policy that takes into account their views on what is happening on your market. This does not mean you have to consult on every detail affecting the market but if, for example, significant increases in charges are proposed or there is a redevelopment project affecting the market, then it is important to take into account your traders views. This does not necessarily mean that you have to accept what your traders tell you but you should be seen to listen and respond with a considered answer. There are lots of Court cases where traders have challenged market operators and have successfully delayed or frustrated plans for the market. The use of newsletters or occasional surveys can show that you are keen to keep in touch with your traders. You might seek to appoint designated trader representatives to discuss issues periodically or form a Markets Forum which is used for consultation purposes.
Encroachment is an ongoing issue for many operators. The most effective way to address this issue is enforce the terms of your lease/licence agreement which should clearly lay out the area of use agreed upon as part of the tenancy. It would also be worth considering offering available additional space out for use by formal agreement. If the additional space required does not have a negative impact on access or impose any risks, this can be a useful way to gain additional income.
There have been several challenges to market rights using the European dimension and to date all the challenges have been successfully defeated. However, this does not mean European requirements can be ignored. It is important that market rights are enforced reasonably and proportionately and there is a clear policy dimension involved. At this point no one knows the full implications of BREXIT but it would be unwise to believe that Councils can go back to enforcing market rights in an arbitrary manner.
Business Rates are charged on both Market Halls and Open Markets. Many Market Halls are now the subject of separate assessments with the traders having assessments in respect of each of their trading units. Street trading is generally exempt from Business Rates but the more the street trading activity is operated like a market e.g. if the operator makes stalls available then the more it is likely to fall under the Business Rates regime.
You’ll need to comply with your financial regulations and consider whether your valuer should be involved or whether it is appropriate for you as markets management to conduct the review. Assessing and comparing the “markets competition” would give you a general idea of what traders are paying within your region – on a square foot/metre, lineage or other basis. A successful market with plenty of customers and successful traders will normally achieve higher rentals than a quiet market with poor economic performance. The level of trader demand, a transparent base rate and an easily collectable amount are also points to consider – and consulting on the pros and cons with trader representatives will provide useful information.
There are two important aspects to this issue. Firstly, a market must have clear and enforceable market regulations. You need to ensure that your regulations are kept under regular review and issues which often lead to conflict such as the items traders can sell, opening hours and placing goods in market alleyways are both workable and enforced by market management. Market operators who fail to enforce the requirements of the regulations may find themselves in difficulty when a disciplinary issue arises. Secondly, when it comes to disciplinary matters you need to have a written down procedure which again is publicly available and shared with traders. It can be part of your market regulations or it can be a separate policy document. It is important, taking into account that you are potentially affecting someone’s livelihood, that any remedies are proportionate to the matter complained about. However, in appropriate cases, there is no reason why a market operator cannot immediately suspend a trader from a market if the matter complained of is sufficiently serious.
The classic definition of a market is a ‘concourse of buyers and sellers’ which has been approved in a number of Court cases. This definition includes car boot sales, table top sales, and specialist events such as Italian markets and Christmas markets. Some local authorities also include antique fayres and wedding fayres in the definition of a market. Normally you will need a minimum of five stands, stalls or pitches to constitute a legal market. The five stands, etc must be allocated to separate traders rather than one trader occupying all five. Obtaining this minimum number is important because once you have a legally constituted market, then certain rights and responsibilities follow.
A good market will have a varied offer of different items but when it comes to letting empty stalls it is always important to agree lettings against the background of a balance of trade policy. This can be a relatively simple document specifying, for example, the number of different trades permitted on the market or can allocate different trades to different parts of the market. It is important that potential traders know how your letting arrangements work and this should be a publicly available policy document. If you have empty stalls you are not obliged to let them to a trader if you feel that your balance of trade policy will be undermined. If, for example, you have three fruit and vegetable traders but several empty stalls, you have no obligation to take another fruit and vegetable trader if you feel that three is what the market can sustain, provided that such an arrangement is covered by your balance of trade policy.
The answer is yes under the provisions of Part 111 of the Food Act 1984.
Pedlars are still governed by the 1871 legislation and case law demonstrates that the current arrangements are very inadequate. If your market is affected by pedlars you need to keep a log of evidence over a few weeks supplemented by photographs and street plans. You need to evidence the size of the pedlar’s trolley or stall, the time that he is in one place, what he is doing when he is not serving customers, how he arrived at the market, whether he goes back to a van to replenish stocks and the distance he moves and at what intervals. Traders can help collect evidence but this will need to be supported by enforcement officers. Once this evidence is collected it can be tested against the current pedlar requirements. Normally if the trolley or stall is bigger than a supermarket trolley, the pedlar remains in one place without serving customers for beyond fifteen minutes and moves only a few yards over an extended period then you have a reasonable cause of action.
You should have a markets licensing policy in place before attempting any action to control a car boot sale. However, if the car boot sale has been operating for some time then you are unlikely to be in position to take effective action. The ultimate enforcement action to protect market rights is to obtain an injunction but the grant of an injunction is a discretionary remedy and if the court feels that you have delayed taking action it is unlikely to be sympathetic. You will have to demonstrate that there has been some material change in the car boot sale operation such as an increase in size.
In addition to all the operational issues the Market Operator should consult in detail with the traders particularly if the new location does not provide as many trading opportunities. There must be clear criteria for applying for stalls etc at the new location. Also the Market Operator needs to consider the needs of the community the market serves particularly if that community represents a particular element of the population. How will the markets community be affected by the move? Some Market Operators have been successfully challenged where this has been neglected.
The granting of a tenancy or lease creates a contractual relationship with the trader but in addition to that relationship the requirements of the Landlord and Tenant legislation provide an additional framework which means that the operator is required to meet the statutory requirements as well as the contractual ones. In order to avoid this situation some market operators include a specific provision within their tenancies and leases formally excluding the requirements of the Landlord and Tenant legislation.
Just because you have certain powers to operate a market does not mean you can set up a market anywhere without getting any other approvals. Market powers only give the market operator the powers to operate the market. The first requirement is to get the approval of the landowner where the market is held. If you do not own or have possession of the relevant land then it means entering into an agreement with the landowner to use the land for the purpose of the market. Secondly, if the market is to be held in a street, highway or pedestrianised area it will be necessary to get an order form the highway authority stopping up the relevant area for the purposes of the market. Depending upon the frequency of the market, this may involve a time consuming and potentially expensive procedure to obtain a traffic regulation order but if the market is only held on one occasion each year, eg a Christmas Market, it might be possible to use a much quicker procedure under section 21 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847.
A Market Operator can change the market day but it is necessary to be clear about the market powers relevant to the market before taking a decision. A Royal Charter might limit the market day to a particular day whereas Part 111 of the Food Act 1984 gives discretion to appoint any day. There needs to be a formally recorded decision – i.e. It needs to be minuted by the Council. In addition to being clear about the powers relied upon the Market operator needs to ensure that any other approvals such as highways and planning are met.
Byelaws are intended to govern behaviour in the market. They apply to both traders and the general public. They are approved by the Secretary of State. There is a model set of byelaws but market operators can amend to suit their particular requirements. The byelaws are enforced by court action. Regulations are part of the contractual relationship with traders and are more flexible than byelaws. They are much easier to review and change as the Market Operator has overall responsibility for enforcement. It is important that both byelaws and regulations are enforced if they are to be of proper use. They can be used together but ensure the provisions are consistent.
This allows a local authority Market Operator to get advance notice of a temporary market. It is an adoptive provision and if it is to be used it is important that information is available to those affected to understand the requirements. It is used most effectively in conjunction with a market licensing policy but it can be used as a stand-alone provision. It has not been used extensively.
Many markets held on highways and streets are called markets but are operated under street trading powers. This is particularly the case in London. These markets are not markets in the strict legal sense and therefore they do not have the rights and responsibilities which attached to markets created under market powers such as royal charter / letters patent and legislation such as Part III of the Food Act 1984. There are important distinctions between the two including the right to control “rival” markets, the level of charges and the ability to make profit. In general terms the street trading legislation is based on a regulatory licensing system whereas market stalls provide more flexibility and have a commercial element attached to them.
A “rival” market is one which is normally created without legal authority. In recent years there has been a tremendous growth in car boot sales, specialist markets, table top sales and food markets, particularly Farmers Markets. Unless such an event can point to legal powers giving the market operator the authority to proceed or they are licensed by a market operator with the relevant powers, then that is a “rival” market. A market operator, using their own powers can set up a licensing system which can determine the number, quality, and balance of the markets in their area. This enables control to be exercised over “rival” markets. Any policy which provides a licensing arrangement needs to be reasonable and proportionate and sets out a framework for the consideration and determination of applications.
It is vitally important that every market operator is clear about the powers they use to hold a market. This can include a royal charter / letters patent/ prescription / loss grant / local legislation and Part III of the Food Act 1984. While many markets enjoy the benefit of a royal charter, which can add status to the market, it is important that a market operator using the provisions of a royal charter understands how the provisions of the royal charter affect the market. There are occasions when the royal charter can be restrictive in how the market operates, for example, limiting the market to a particular day of the week. If these restrictions exist or if there is uncertainty about the provisions of the royal charter then a local authority market operator should look to use the provisions of Part III of the Food Act 1984. This is a modern statutory framework for the operation of markets and provides powers to deal with all the main issues affecting markets. There is no reason why a royal charter cannot be used alongside Part III of the Food Act 1984 provided there is clarity on how the respective powers are to be applied. It should be a public statement setting out the powers under which the market operates so those affected by the market are clear about the basis upon which it operates.